|
1. What is the enforcement orcement date for this regulation? A. From 1 January 2012, the MARPOL Annex VI global fuel sulfur limit for fuel oil will be reduced from 4.50% to 3.50%.
2. Who is responsible for the 3.50% limit? Is the onus on the supplier or the fuel user? A. All bunker suppliers inclusive of those supplying fuel oils outside of ECAs will have to comply with the new limit.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
"I told you so" is such a nice feeling when almost everyone takes the opposing point of view and subsequent events prove you right. Here is the what happened recently. A shipping company ordered bunker fuel. The test lab reported presence of styrene, alpha methyl styrene and DCPD at very high levels. This lab recommended that the fuel should not be used. The supplier disagreed and the buyer and the supplier agreed to subject this fuel to analysis at another well known lab for final resolution which should be accepted by both parties. This second lab also came up with very high values for styrene, DCPD, dihydro?DCPD and very high Indene as well. It was obvious that these were residues from Ethylene cracker from a petrochemical plant.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
The new revision of MARPOL Annex VI includes a clause to prevent ships from being penalised for fuel quality non-compliance outside their control in connection with Regulation 18.
There should be no penalty to ships that are unable to obtain the fuel necessary to comply with a given requirement under Regulation 14 (LSFO). Ships must provide documentation proving that it could not get hold of compliant fuel, prior to entering an ECA, despite best efforts.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
You have received two technical updates in the recent past, one about fuels containing several contaminants causing machinery damage to three vessels (2011/2/3 ) and the second technical update(2011/2/4) about a fuel supplied in Sevilla, Spain containing unacceptable high levels of contaminants. The question on your minds is likely to be "What protection do I have against supply of problem fuels?”
|
|
Read more...
|
The present paper intends to inform DNV clients and other interested parties about potential consequences of the introduction of various international and regional regulations, specifi cally the EU Directive 2005/33/EC and new sections of the California Code of Regulation title 13/17. Both of these regulations set forth limitations on the sulphur content of marine fuels used in specifi ed areas (EU ports and Californian waters) The paper specifically aim at providing a summary of DNV’s and various industry stakeholders concerns regarding operations using fuels that comply with the abovementioned regulations general recommendations for safe operation.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
From feedback recently received from one of our surveyors, we give an example of a change-over from high sulphur to low sulphur fuel operation that did not work as intended.
More stringent requirements for low sulphur fuel (LSF) operation came into force on 1 January 2010 (EU ports) and the requirements concerning operation in European and Californian waters will stepwise become stricter.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
Viswa Lab wishes to share our knowledge on this subject: First of all, styrene in isolation does not cause problems, unless these levels are very high. Similarly, DCPD in isolation does not cause problems.
However, styrene and DCPD and Indene (which is being seen more, lately) together do seem to cause machinery problems.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
Accepted by SAE and ASTM, the standard test method to measure diesel fuel lubricity is conducted on the High Frequency Reciprocating Rig (HFRR). With HFRR, a ball is placed on a flat surface and rapidly vibrated back and forth with a stroke distance of one millimeter while 200 grams of weight is applied.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
GL organized, with the support of MAN and Aalborg, a Workshop on the issue of Low Sulphur Fuels and the implementation of the EU Directive in force from January 1st, 2010, which requires the use of maximum 0.1% sulphur content fuel on ships at berth in EU.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS PERTAINING TO EU DIRECTIVE 2005/33/EC ON MARINE FUEL SULPHUR LIMIT, TO BE ENFORCED ON 1 JANUARY 2010
Infomarine On-Line Technical Library
| File | Description | File size |
DNV_EU_LOW-SULFURE_FRQUENTLY_ASK_QUESTIONS.pdf | FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS PERTAINING TO EU DIRECTIVE 2005/33/EC ON MARINE FUEL SULPHUR LIMIT, TO BE ENFORCED ON 1 JANUARY 2010 | 59 Kb |
|
|
Read more...
|
|
MARPOL Annex VI "Regulations for the Prevention of Air Pollution from Ships" stipulate that Heavy
Fuel Oil (HFO) combustion is not permitted during port stay and in specific areas at sea.
Infomarine On-Line Technical Library
| File | Description | File size |
AALBORG-BOILERS-Fuelchange.pdf | MARPOL Annex VI "Regulations for the Prevention of Air Pollution from Ships" stipulate that Heavy Fuel Oil (HFO) combustion is not permitted during port stay and in specific areas at sea. | 1218 Kb |
|
|
Read more...
|
|
Regulation on Fuel Sulfur and Other Operational Requirements for Ocean-Going Vessels within California Waters and 24 Nautical Miles of the California Baseline The purpose of this Marine Notice is to advise owners and operators of ocean-going vessels of the recordkeeping requirements in subsection (e)(2), “Recordkeeping, Reporting, and Monitoring Requirements” in California’s regulation establishing fuel sulfur requirements for ocean-going vessels (“regulation”).
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
|
|
|